Why Milling Is Still King in Dental Restorations
In the rapidly evolving world of digital dentistry, new technologies like resin printing and hybrid additive systems are making headlines. Yet when it comes to producing strong, precise, and sustainable restorations, milling still reigns supreme.
Precision That Protects Resources
Milling is a subtractive process—but it’s far from wasteful. With today’s advanced nesting software and multi-case optimization, every zirconia disc is used to its fullest potential. Modern CAD/CAM systems calculate exact tool paths, minimizing unnecessary cuts and maximizing the yield from each puck.
Compared to 3D printing—where supports and cleaning processes add significant waste—milling offers a more controlled and predictable use of material. Although a portion of each zirconia puck is milled away as swarf, the process is optimized through intelligent nesting, allowing multiple restorations to be produced from a single disc with minimal leftover space. The resulting material use is consistent, measurable, and easier to plan for, leading to far less unexpected waste across large production runs.
Built from Solid Strength
Each crown or bridge is carved from a dense, pre-sintered zirconia puck—ensuring unmatched durability and long-term stability. Because the internal structure remains uniform, milled restorations maintain superior flexural strength and do not suffer from the micro-layer weaknesses common in printed resins.
Consistent Shades, Zero Guesswork
Multi-layer zirconia discs, such as Alien Multi-Layer 2.0, are engineered for perfect shade transitions. Milling simply reveals the color gradient that’s already embedded in the material—no over-curing, fading, or color inconsistency. That means fewer remakes, less polishing time, and less material waste from rejected cases.
Smarter Workflows, Cleaner Results
Modern mills are faster, cleaner, and smarter. Toolpath optimization, automatic nesting, and AI-based design systems like IOScans.com ensure that every restoration is designed and milled with minimal human error—and minimal material waste. From start to finish, the process is predictable, repeatable, and sustainable.
Less Waste, More Value
Both 3D printing and milling have their own types of material loss, but the key difference lies in predictability and recoverability. Milling waste is consistent, measurable, and can be reduced through precise nesting and disc optimization. Each puck’s output can be forecasted accurately, ensuring efficient use of material across multiple restorations.
In contrast, 3D printing waste varies widely depending on print orientation, support density, and post-processing methods. Resin trapped in supports or lost during washing and curing often cannot be reclaimed, making true material efficiency harder to control.
As a result, milling provides a more stable and resource-conscious workflow, producing restorations that combine material strength, precision, and long-term sustainability.
The Final Verdict
While 3D printing has its place for prototypes, guides, and models, milling remains the undisputed leader for final restorations. It offers:
-
Superior accuracy and strength
-
Predictable esthetics
-
Streamlined, eco-efficient workflows
-
Less waste and higher yield
At Alien Milling Technologies, every puck, toolpath, and restoration is optimized for excellence and efficiency. Because in the end, milling doesn’t just make crowns—it makes sense.